During times of macroeconomic uncertainty, Bitcoin is often the first asset to be sold off. This trend can be attributed to its market structure, which is heavily influenced by perpetual futures that create a consistent long bias and positive funding rates. As a result, taking short positions becomes structurally easier and more cost-effective during periods of market stress.

Since its launch, Bitcoin has maintained a bullish outlook in the Perpetual Futures market, with funding rates predominantly remaining positive (where longs compensate shorts). In contrast, gold typically sees an increase in value during such stressful economic events as investors flock to safe-haven assets. The selling of Bitcoin is less about its classification as a “risk-on” or “risk-off” asset and more about the underlying mechanics of perpetual funding.

The persistent positivity in Bitcoin’s funding means that any surge in long demand will further elevate these rates, thereby increasing the costs associated with maintaining long positions. Conversely, shorting becomes less expensive or even subsidized under these conditions. Thus, external pressures on the market tend to favor shorting rather than holding onto longs.

In our previous analysis regarding Bitcoin’s heightened volatility through the lens of market structure dynamics—characterized by speculative leverage and dominance from derivatives—we noted how this differs significantly from traditional commodities like Gold or Oil that operate within physically anchored frameworks with lower leverage ratios.

Article: Whale’s Digital Asset View: Why Bitcoin Sells Off While Gold Stabilizes

This piece delves into why Bitcoin consistently faces sell-offs ahead of other assets during widespread risk events—especially those occurring outside standard trading hours. As we previously mentioned, labeling Bitcoin merely as a “risk-on asset” provides little explanation for this behavior; instead we should ask:

  • Which asset can swiftly meet immediate macro hedging needs?
  • Which markets facilitate large-scale short exposure without friction at any given moment?
  • Which assets impose higher carrying costs on long positions compared to shorts?

Bitcoin meets all three criteria effectively.

The Consistent Positivity of Bitcoin Funding Rates

The cryptocurrency derivatives landscape primarily operates through perpetual futures rather than fixed-term contracts. On major exchanges today, perpetual swaps dominate both volume and open interest due to their lack of expiration dates and continuous margin requirements; they serve as key instruments for quick positioning and price discovery within the crypto ecosystem. Typically speaking, movements in spot prices follow trends set by derivatives markets rather than leading them.

A defining feature distinguishing perpetual futures from traditional contracts lies within their unique funding rate mechanism: instead of converging towards spot prices upon expiry like conventional futures do; they remain tethered via periodic payments exchanged between longs and shorts based on current contract pricing relative to spot values. When trading above spot levels leads us into positive territory where longs pay shorts—and vice versa when below spot values create negative scenarios resulting in shorts compensating longs—this system perpetually aligns directional demands across traders’ interests.

Source: The Bitcoin Magazine

The chart illustrates how since inception until now there has been an overarching bullish sentiment toward bitcoin reflected through largely positive fundings (longs paying shorts) most days across prominent exchanges like Binance & Bybit indicating sustained willingness among participants opting for upside exposure despite potential volatility risks involved over shorter timeframes too!

Easiest Major Asset To Short? That Would Be BTC!

Source: Coinglass

Bottom Line

Will this behavior change? Could BTC evolve into something akin-to gold being viewed solely-as-a-safe haven option anytime soon? Probably not! Given existing structures currently present around it don’t favor holding onto longer-term bets while facing downward pressure stemming from macroeconomic uncertainties ahead! Since most times it experiences favorable fundings (longs paying out), whenever fresh demand arises pushing rates up even further creates additional burdens tied directly back downwards along lines drawn against corresponding carry-cost ratios tipping overall balance towards increased amounts allocated toward shortening practices reinforcing tendencies observed historically. Thus leaving us wondering whether anything could realistically alter established patterns moving forward…
Disclaimer: This content does not constitute investment advice nor financial recommendations but serves purely informational purposes only!

The post BloFin Research: 
Why BTC Gets Sold First During Risk Events appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *