
Peter Schiff, a well-known critic of Bitcoin and a prominent financial analyst, is once again advising investors to take advantage of market dips. However, this time his focus is not on cryptocurrencies or precious metals like gold and silver. Instead, Schiff has turned his attention to stocks associated with metal production, which he claims are currently undervalued based on the actual prices of the commodities they represent.
In the latest trading session, gold closed at $4,443 after a decline of 1.14%, while silver experienced an even steeper drop of 4.71%, settling at $77.34. This downward trend has already begun to affect mining companies negatively. According to Schiff’s analysis, these mining stocks have absorbed much of the previous risk and are now priced significantly lower than current spot prices for these metals.

Meanwhile, Bitcoin saw a decrease of 2.14%, bringing its price down to $91,742. Typically such fluctuations would prompt commentary from Schiff—who often leverages crypto volatility in his discussions—but this time he chose not to address it publicly and instead focused solely on metal markets.
What Is Schiff Discussing?
Schiff highlighted a notable discrepancy between physical commodity pricing and valuations assigned to publicly traded mining companies. With the S&P 500 remaining stable at 6,947.39 without significant risk-off movements affecting broader markets, he argues that the selling pressure faced by miners does not reflect any overarching equity sell-off or cross-asset de-risking trends.
The sector’s decline appears isolated; it seems driven more by sentiment influenced by commodity price fluctuations rather than any real deterioration in demand forecasts or cost structures related to production.
Importantly, Schiff is neither making bullish predictions about metals nor altering his long-held views regarding monetary policy strategies. Instead, he points out an inefficiency in pricing between two closely linked markets—and notably refrained from using Bitcoin’s performance as leverage for his argument this time around.