Recent data from SoSoValue indicates that publicly traded companies purchased a mere $70,000 worth of bitcoin last week, marking an astonishing 99.93% decline in buying activity. Notably, only BHODL managed to acquire 1 $BTC, while major players opted to refrain from making any purchases.
The once vigorous accumulation of bitcoin ($BTC) by corporations has effectively come to a halt. According to new figures from SoSoValue, net acquisitions by publicly listed firms plummeted by 99.93% week-over-week down to just $70,000 as of March 30, 2026 at 8 a.m. Eastern Time. In stark contrast to the previous week’s robust figures where hundreds of bitcoins were added, non-mining public companies globally recorded only a net addition of one $BTC. This represents one of the weakest weekly performances since SoSoValue began monitoring corporate treasury activities amidst fluctuating spot prices and erratic ETF inflows.
This significant downturn is reflected in the actions (or lack thereof) among key industry players. The firm known as Strategy—previously MicroStrategy and recognized for its aggressive corporate bitcoin investments—has not reported any new purchases this week according to SoSoValue’s findings. Similarly, Japanese company Metaplanet has also remained inactive with “eleven consecutive weeks without purchases” following a period in which it made smaller but consistent acquisitions throughout 2025. Both firms had previously been notable incremental buyers over recent quarters; at one point Strategy held more than 1% of total supply within its treasury.
Only BHODL Takes Action While Others Hold Back
In this context, UK-based company BHODL stands out as the sole entity noted by SoSoValue for increasing its holdings last week. On March 26th, BHODL revealed an investment totaling $72,832 for acquiring one Bitcoin—a modest sum but significant given the otherwise stagnant market conditions during that period. Concurrently, two European firms have announced intentions to enhance their exposure through strategic deals and additional capital rather than immediate spot market transactions.
Swedish health technology firm H100 expressed plans to acquire Norwegian companies Moonshot AS and Never Say Die AS via an all-stock deal aimed at boosting its bitcoin reserves up to 3,501 $BTC upon completion of the transaction. Meanwhile, French asset manager Capital B disclosed it has successfully secured financing amounting to €2.8 million specifically intended for future Bitcoin acquisitions—effectively raising capital rather than executing immediate buys.
Treasuries Continue Holding Significant Supply Percentage
Despite this dramatic slowdown in weekly purchasing activity among corporations’ treasuries remain substantial holders within the asset space; according to calculations from SoSoValue they currently possess approximately 1,023 ,333 $BTC, valued around $6 .939 billion or roughly representing about 5 .1 % of Bitcoin’s circulating market capitalization . This figure reflects only a marginal increase (0 .000098 %) compared with prior weeks emphasizing how subdued net accumulation trends have become recently.
Past coverage on crypto.news regarding corporate treasury adoption highlighted how entities like Strategy and Metaplanet utilized Bitcoin primarily as long-term balance sheet hedges aligning with broader trends wherein businesses integrated cryptocurrency alongside cash reserves or bonds into their financial strategies . Additionally , separate reports indicated that ETF-driven flows increasingly influence price dynamics often overshadowing direct corporate purchasing efforts when macroeconomic factors tighten further complicating matters leading even proactive treasury buyers towards cautious stances during uncertain times ahead
The staggering drop-off observed this week aligns seamlessly within these patterns ; amid ongoing fluctuations across ETFs regulatory developments economic indicators appear poised now dictate future directions leaving many corporates awaiting clearer signals before committing further investments thus placing greater reliance upon retail investors alongside fund flows instead another aggressive spree reminiscent MicroStrategy’s past initiatives