Bitcoin’s Groundhog Day: Another Six Weeks of Macro Winter?
Today, Bitcoin experienced its own version of Groundhog Day as Punxsutawney Phil “saw his shadow” on the 140th anniversary of this tradition, predicting six more weeks of winter. This occurred shortly after $BTC dropped to $74,000 in a significant risk-off movement.
This timing was quite symbolic: a mix of forced liquidations, ETF outflows, and increasing real yields hinted that the cryptocurrency market might be entering an extended period characterized by macroeconomic chill and heightened volatility leading up to the March FOMC meeting.
As we went to press, Bitcoin had made a slight recovery to approximately $77,500 as a selloff in cross-asset risks intersected with crypto’s continuous trading environment.
The total liquidations across cryptocurrencies exceeded $2 billion over the weekend alone, with more than $800 million occurring within just 24 hours.
The key takeaway for the upcoming weeks is that Bitcoin continues to act like leveraged risk exposure when there are rapid changes in discount rates and dollar valuations.
This situation serves as another stress test for Bitcoin’s reputation as “digital gold.” This is particularly relevant when traditional gold performs better during periods of risk aversion while Bitcoin aligns more closely with long-duration risks.
Dynamics of ETF Flows and Liquidations
The flow data has provided clear insights into marginal demand trends on a daily basis.
Farside Investors’ reports indicate substantial net outflows from ETFs leading into late January. Several days saw hundreds of millions being withdrawn from spot demand within just one session.
This trend is significant because when ETFs redeem shares, price dips do not benefit from mechanical buying support. Consequently, any liquidation cascade can extend further due to thinner order books available for trading.
| Date (2026) | US Spot $BTC ETF Total Net Flow (US$m) |
|---|---|
| Jan. 16 | -394.7 |
| Jan. 21 | -708.7 |
| Jan. 29 | -817.8 |
| Jan. 30 | -509.7 |
Macro indicators were also moving against assets sensitive to duration during this period.
According to Trading Economics data at closing on January 30 th , U.S .10-year nominal yields hovered around4 .24 –4 .26 % , while StreetStats reported real yields for10 -year TIPS at about1 .93 % during that same timeframe.
In practical terms , such levels typically raise investment hurdles for assets dependent on future adoption or liquidity conditions .They also narrow speculative leverage ranges without necessitating periodic resets.
| Macro Reference (January30 Close) | Level |
|---|---|
| U.S .10-year Nominal Yield | ~4 .24 –4 .26 % |
| U.S.Ten-Year Real Yield(TIPS) | ~1 .93 % |
Policy regime uncertainty has played into this repricing narrative.
Recent headlines surrounding Kevin Warsh and Federal Reserve leadership contribute towards higher perceived risks across markets linked with Fed independence perceptions along inflation trajectories.
<
/
p
<
P
Crypto often reflects such uncertainties more intensely due largely because applying leverage becomes easier; liquidity tends toward thinning outside U.S.hours making automatic liquidations occur once collateral thresholds are breached.
This explains why it’s essential treat these liquidations merely as transmission mechanisms rather than root causes.
Macroeconomic repricing establishes directionality; prices then fall into less-liquid environments where additional supply through liquidation exacerbates downward movements.
Ahead Of The March FOMC Meeting: What To Monitor?
For those contemplating whether we’re truly facing “six more weeks,” an actionable checklist emerges focused primarily upon whether marginal bids resurface before our next major policy milestone arrives.
Within two-to-six week windows:
Sustained inflows into ETFs would signal clear shifts mechanically—indicating not merely single green days but runs counteracting late-January redemption trends.
Monitoring if real yields drift lower from ~two percent could alleviate pressure exerted by discount rates impacting risky assets would be crucial too!
Lastly assessing implied volatility mean reversion post-flush will prove vital—Deribit’s DVOL index surged roughly37to44during selloff week—a DVOL level above44suggests expected moves nearing±13%over thirty-day horizons using common rules-of-thumb(annualized vol divided square-root twelve).
This scenario allows room still left open allowing potential two-way price fluctuations even amid cooling headlines! Two paths emerge stemming same gauges:
If ETF totals remain net negative over multiple sessions alongside stable recent yield levels—Bitcoin may continue functioning akin levered-risk beta heading toward March rallies capped potentially by redemptions-driven supplies & lingering hedging demands options-wise!
Conversely should stabilizing flows occur alongside diminishing macro-tightening effects—the post-liquidation reset reduces forced-selling threats allowing spot demands dictate pace instead cascading pressures setting rhythm anew!
The calendar presents us clean endpoints reflecting Groundhog Day metaphor clearly—the next Federal Open Market Committee meeting slated betweenMarch17–18in2026!